DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF WAVAL RECORDS .
701 8. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100"
ARLINGTON, VA 92904-2490 ,
bgc
Docket No. NR3951-14
19 Nov 14
a
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
18 November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of chis Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7431 Ser
N130C/14U1257 dated 25 September 2014, a COPY of which was sent to you
on 10 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 28 October 2014. A
copy is being provided to you now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docker Wo, NRSG5Si-44
consequentiy, when appayang fui a wwhbeclion oF an ei foreign Besta
demonstrate the existence of
record, the burden is on the applicant to
probable material error or injustice.
Vie
ee ow Y fobert IT O'NEILL
ee : ‘te Fxecutive Director
Enclosure:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4254 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2478 14
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence igs evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3276-14 rrection of an official naval Consequentiy, when applying for a co demonstrate the existence De record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8921 13
NR8921-13 te tates oe Te ee to your application for correction of your naval This is in referen 0 uSC 1552. . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR101 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9659 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 5420 Ser N130C1/14U1140 dated 27 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached. NES for a correction of an otficial Consegquentiy, when applying naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3872 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5890 14
WRO5890-14 28 October 2014 This is in reference to your appiication for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...